The effect of the coronavirus vaccinations on seizures in patients with epilepsy.

Purpose: Information on COVID-19 vaccine tolerance and complications in patients with epilepsy is not yet sufficient to provide a recommendation for vaccination guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two types of COVID vaccines currently used in Turkey (mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech and inactivated vaccine from Sinovac) on epileptic seizures. Methods: We included 318 patients with epilepsy who were admitted to our epilepsy outpatient clinic. Clinical characteristics such as age, gender, age at seizure onset and the duration of epilepsy were noted. Types and the numbers of the anti-seizure drugs were recorded. Patients were evaluated either by face-to-face or by teleconference interviews. The seizure frequency in the first thirty days after any dose of vaccination was questioned. Results: A total of 318 patients (149 females, 46.8%) with a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy were enrolled in the study. An increase in seizure frequency was reported after the COVID-19 vaccine in 19 patients. Of these 19 patients, 2 were vaccinated with Sinovac, while 17 were vaccinated with BioNTech/Pfizer mRNA vaccine. There was no significant relationship between age, age at seizure onset, duration of epilepsy, type of seizures, seizure frequency or seizure induction. Status epilepticus was not reported in any of the participants. Conclusion: Physicians need strong scientific evidence to advocate the importance of vaccine for COVID-19, that's why accumulation of knowledge related to this issue is important not only from medical but also from medico-legal point of interest. We aimed to contribute the current literature with our study to strengthen the physicians' hand while recommending COVID vaccines to PWE. Our results show that there is no significant increase in the risk of triggering seizures with COVID-19 vaccines. These data show that vaccination against COVID-19 with both vaccine types in patients with epilepsy is safe and well tolerated.

Increased prevalence of mild myopathic changes in the post-COVID-19 duration.

OBJECTIVE: There are reports of peripheral nerve and muscle involvement during or after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), even following a mild infection. Here, we aimed to analyze the objective findings regarding peripheral nerve, neuromuscular junction, and muscle function using electrophysiology in patients with a previous COVID-19 infection. METHODS: All consecutive patients with a history of COVID-19 were questioned for post-COVID-19 duration-related neurological complaints via Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31), modified Toronto Neuropathy score (mTORONTO), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Patients were dichotomized into two groups based on their scores in the questionnaire. Group 1 (patients with high scores in any area of the questionnaire) and Group 2 (patients with normal scores in all sections of the questionnaire). In the second step, Group 1 was invited to a preplanned hospital visit for electrophysiological analysis, including nerve conduction studies, repetitive nerve stimulation, needle electromyography (EMG), quantitative motor unit potential analysis (qMUP), and single fiber EMG. We included 106 patients in the study. According to the questionnaire, 38 patients constituted Group 1, and 68 formed Group 2. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 14 accepted and underwent preplanned electrophysiological examinations. Needle EMG revealed small, short, polyphasic MUPs with early recruitment, and qMUP analysis demonstrated an increased percentage of polyphasic potentials in three patients. The examinations in other patients were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of complaints and objective myopathic findings in our cohort implicated the role of muscle involvement in the post-COVID-19 duration. Considering the socioeconomic and psychological burden of the post-COVID-19 duration among individuals and societies, a better understanding of the symptoms and myopathy is warranted.

Autonomic and neuropathic complaints of long-COVID objectified: an investigation from electrophysiological perspective.

PURPOSE: Here , we aimed to assess the frequency and phenomenology of autonomic and neuropathic complaints of long-COVID and to evaluate them by means of electrophysiology. METHODS: Step 1. Patients with prior COVID-19 infection were screened by COMPASS-31 and mTORONTO to create the target population for further evaluation. Step 2. Patients with high scores were invited for a detailed history of their complaints and electrophysiological analysis, which included nerve conduction studies, cutaneous silent period (CSP), and sympathetic skin response (SSR). We also constituted a control group composed of healthy subjects of similar age and sex for electrophysiological analysis. RESULTS: There were 106 patients, who matched the study criteria. Among them, thirty-eight patients (%35.8) had neuropathic or autonomic complaints or both. Fatigue and headache were significantly more frequent in patients with autonomic and neuropathic complaints. Detailed examination and electrophysiological evaluation were performed in 14 of 38 patients. Neuropathic complaints were patchy and proximally located in the majority. The entire CSP suppression index was higher in the patients (p = 0.002). There was no difference in palmar and plantar SSR between patients and healthy subjects. mTORONTO scores were negatively correlated with palmar and plantar SSR amplitudes, and the correlation was moderate. CONCLUSION: Neuropathic or autonomic complaints were seen in more than one-third of patients with long-COVID. Neuropathic complaints were generally patchy, proximally predominant, asymmetric, or diffuse. The CSP suppression index was abnormal whereas SSRs were normal.

Analysis of neurology consultations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and were consulted by neurology during their hospital stay. METHODS: All files of patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital between March 11th and December 31st, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and files of patients who consulted by neurology during their stay were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics, neurologic diagnosis, outcome and related laboratory data were extracted from electronic medical records and analyzed. Patients were categorized into the first wave and second wave according to the date of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 2257 patients were hospitalized for COVID-19; among them, 127 were consulted by a neurologist during their hospital stay. Fifteen patients received a consultation for possible drug interactions. Among the remaining 112 patients, the reason for neurology consultation was i. exacerbation of a neurological comorbidity vs ii. new-onset neurological manifestations. The median age was 68.5 ± 14.2 years, and 60.7% were men. Dementia and stroke were the leading neurological comorbidities. COVID-19 disease was more severe in the patients with the new-onset neurological comorbidity than in patients with exacerbation of a neurological comorbidity (p = 0.07). Serum creatinine kinase levels were higher in the new-onset patient group (p < 0.05). Exacerbation of previous neurological disease or new neurological impairment were jointly and severely related to high mortality (overall 35/112 vs 275/2145, p < 0.001; exacerbation 12/45 vs 275/2145 p < 0.01; new-onset 23/67 vs 275/2145, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Serious neurological involvement is relatively uncommon in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and is associated with increased mortality.